How The Elite Control Politics
 |
Desc: Please rate and comment and send this video to all your contacts :)
INFOWARS.COM
http://www.InfoWars.com
This is a very simple animated version of Alex Jones's talk on the fraudulent left-right 2-party paradigm that we are all locked into. In the original version, Alex uses pen and paper to sketch out the 2-party paradigm. I was already aware of how the 2-party system is used to contain revolution in most "democratic" countries. But I was very impressed with the way that Alex sketched it out in simple, easy-to-understand terms. I therefore decided to spend an afternoon transferring his sketches into a 2D animation. It is very important for us all to realise that we are living under a simple but clever system that has been designed to contain revolution whilst projecting the illusion of being a free, fair and open democracy. The 2-party system provides firm support for the elite to implement their agenda from the top down, whilst the ordinary people at the grassroots level squabble between themselves over which political party is the best. In reality, it doesn't matter which of the two parties you vote for because the same agenda will unfold regardless. Hence, both parties are controlled at the very top by the same force.
Oh yeah, YouTube, please stop censoring the view counters on these videos, it is beyond obvious now and just about every YouTube user knows that you fiddle the view counters to keep videos like this off the most-viewed lists. Why bother when it is just so blatantly obvious? |
Ricky Gervais Politics Tour Live (Part 1 of 7)
 |
Desc: Ricky Gervais Politics Tour Live (Part 1) |
politics of preschool
 |
Desc: A preschool girl attempts to gain social status through material means only to find out she's been trumped. www.myspace.com/heidivanlier. And super thanks to http://www.youtube.com/user/CushTV !!!! |
Inside USA - The politics of rice - 04 Jul 08 - Part 1
 |
Desc: Inside USA travels to Haiti to look at how the stories of politics, rice and the US are deeply interwoven. |
Clerks Clip - Jedi Politics
 |
Desc: A funny, yet political view on Star Wars' Return of the jedi movie.
myspace.com/steve_o_
stop by and say hi. |
George Lakoff: Moral Politics
 |
Desc: UC Berkeley professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics George Lakoff explores how successful political debates are framed by using language targeted to people's values instead of their support for specific government programs in this public lecture sponsored by the Helen Edison Series at UC San Diego. Series: "Helen Edison Lecture Series" [11/2005] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 11194] |
20/20 - Politically Incorrect Guide To Politics - Pt. 1 of 6
 |
Desc: Originally aired on Friday, October 17, 2008 @ 9pm CST.
This broadcast was sourced from an ABC affiliate in Chicago, IL.
Apparently, there were affiliates that refused to carry this one-hour special. If anyone has information about this, please let me know. |
KoRn - Politics (unedited)
 |
Desc: just listen to it or leave me alone |
Michael Darius - Magic of Politics
 |
Desc: Michael Darius - Magic of Politics (Andrew K Trip To 99 remix)
more about this artist youll find in http://www.michaeldarius.com |
Politics and religion
 |
Desc: A deadly combination.
You can download an audio version of this video at http://patcondell.libsyn.com/ |
Sexy Girls Hot Politics
 |
Desc: The hottest new online dating site in the world.
www.cafepress.com/barelypolitical for crazy election stuff. |
Korn Politics
 |
Desc: Korn Video KornMEx.com |
Politics of Stem Cell Research
 |
Desc: Medical Personnel find themselves in a quandry over sentiments expressed by the President of the United States. |
Malaysia Dirty Politics(pt1)
 |
Desc: Foreign Correspondent Documentary about Malaysia politics situation(part1) |
Tell McCain to End the Politics of Hate
 |
Desc: Sign the petition: http://therealmccain.com/mob
We'd like to talk about the pressing issues facing our country: the woeful economy, rising unemployment, the housing crisis, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But we can't talk about them because John McCain and Sarah Palin have distracted us with the politics of hate and fear.
Instead of discussing the real issues plaguing Americans, McCain and Palin have turned to fear-mongering and race-baiting, stoking the prejudices of their supporters. The situation has become so critical that we've teamed up with Color of Change to put an end to these dangerous mob scenes.
Things have gotten so out of control that some conservatives have come forward to denounce McCain and Palin's hate-mongering. In an Op-Ed for The Baltimore Sun, Frank Schaeffer writes: "John McCain: If your campaign does not stop equating Sen. Barack Obama with terrorism, questioning his patriotism and portraying Mr. Obama as "not one of us," I accuse you of deliberately feeding the most unhinged elements of our society the red meat of hate, and therefore of potentially instigating violence."
Don't let McCain and Palin undo the decades spent fighting for civil rights and equality in our country.
Digg this video: http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Tell_McCain_to_End_the_Politics_of_Hate |
America's "Brain-Dead" Politics - Fareed Zakaria
 |
Desc: Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2008/05/27/Fareed_Zakaria_Thriving_in_a_Post_America-Centric_World
Author Fareed Zakaria criticizes American political culture for ignoring global issues, and for focusing on short-term political benefits at the expense of long-term prosperity.
-----
The rise of other nations need not mean a decline of the U.S., says Zakaria. He foresees a future where the U.S. no longer dominates the global economy, geopolitics and culture, and it needn't be seen as a negative development, he believes; our nation needs to learn to understand other nations and find a way to thrive in this rapidly shifting dynamic.
Join us as Newsweek International's editor shares his insights on how our nation can thrive in the coming millennium - The Commonwealth Club of California
Fareed Zakaria is the editor of Newsweek International and author of The Post American World and The Future of Freedom. |
Malaysia Dirty Politics(pt2)
 |
Desc: Foreign Correspondent Documentary about Malaysia politics situation(part2) |
Ken Wilber - Integral Politics
 |
Desc: At the recent 5-day Integral Institute seminar on Integral Business Leadership,
Ken Wilber was asked, by a senior Zen teacher, "What do you think of the Republican convention?"
Ken responded by giving an overview of what a truly integral politics might look like, and used that to compare and contrast with the Democratic and Republican conventions, both of which are less-than-integral. We think that this twenty-minute summary is brilliant, insightful, deadly serious, and wickedly funny, all at once. But by all accounts it is an extraordinary account of why all politics today are considerably less-than-integral, along with certain features that almost certainly would have to be included in the future in any truly integral politics.
In this synopsis, Ken focuses on three items that all political theories have attempted to address but none have managed to fully integrate. These are the tension between (1) the individual and the collective; (2) the source of the cause of human suffering: is the individual primarily to blame or is the society primarily to blame?; and (3) the different levels of development that the different political parties tend to represent: any truly integral politics would include and represent all of them, and yet how on earth do you do that?
Due to time considerations, Ken did not discuss two other equally important ingredients in any integral politics. One. In representational democracies, people have a right to be at whatever stage of development they are at, and generally speaking, within free speech, a right to express the values of whatever stage they are at. Traditional-fundamentalist (blue) has a right to be traditional, modernist (orange) has a right to be modernist, postmodernist (green) has a right to be postmodernist, and so on. This is generally modified in practice, to the extent that the center of gravity of a culture will tend to impose its values on others, especially if they are first-tier (or less-than-integral) values. Nonetheless, in democratic societies, there's a general background understanding that people have a right to be, and a right to express, whatever stage they are or whatever belief system they possess.
Two. They do not, however, have a right to act on those beliefs. This is generally handled in representative democracies by a separation of public and private, and by a similar if more specific principle of the separation of church and state. This means that, for example, in the privacy of my blue-meme mind, I am free to believe that Jesus Christ is my personal savior and that nobody achieves salvation without a belief in Jesus. In public behavior, however, I am not allowed to burn at the stake somebody who disagrees with me. In terms of integral psychology, this means in the interior of an individual (i.e., the upper left), the person can believe whatever they like; but in their public behavior (i.e., the upper right), they must behave according to laws drawn from a worldcentric or higher level of development (lower left), or else they are charged with civil or criminal behavior and removed from society if necessary (lower right).
This separation of church and state, or more generally what Max Weber called the differentiation of the values spheres, is one of the great and enduring contributions of the Western enlightenment, a contribution almost entirely misunderstood by extreme postmodernists, who in fact are operating under its protection while bitterly condemning it.
(The most common version of this is the aggressive attempt to reduce "I" and "It" to "We,' or the attempt to reduce art and science to a social construction, which can therefore be deconstructed. As it turns out, this reductionism presumes precisely what it denies, but then, deconstructive postmodernism has been little without its performative contradictions.)
A truly integral politics exists nowhere on the planet at this time, principally because not enough individuals have emerged at the integral levels of consciousness, and hence no governments anywhere have integral representatives as members (except rarely and by accident). Its principal challenge is to create some form of governance that allows each stage to be itself within the constraints of not harming others (i.e., to let red be red, and blue be blue, and orange be orange, and green be green, etc—precisely because, as we saw, this is a right in virtually all free societies), and yet to govern from the highest, widest, deepest, and most encompassing levels of development emerged to date (starting at yellow). Most representative democracies do this anyway, except their center of gravity is not yet fully integral, and they do it implicitly, not explicitly. |